HABITAT
Subscribe for Daily Updates!
A shareholder was a board member 2 years ago and has since resigned. He soon moved out of the building to another co-op (in which his wife is on the board) and leased his apartment. He has been subjected to a sublet fee (instituted while he was on the board) and has constantly complained about the fact that it's too high and he can't afford to pay fee. We looked into other calculation methods, but none was better than the one in place. As such, this was communicated to him.
At our annual shareholders meeting recently, he nominated himself for re-election to the board, and has brought up the same complaint about the sublet fee.
We feel his rejoining the board is a conflict of interest because:
1) He does not live in the building - and is unable to participate as other resident board members, and
2) His re-joining the board appears disingenuous and not in the best interest of the co-op as a whole
Is this legal and has anyone experienced this situation? Would appreciate any and all comments on this matter.
Thanks.
Carl's first two points are correct as far as I know. Single issue Board members rarely last long,either they achieve their goals and leave, or fail and leave. The greater issue is, even if they recuse themselves, their friendships, presence etc. can affect votes. The real problem is that it is actually a form of self-dealing, if, in fact, they can directly benefit from the outcome of a vote. I don't believe residency, while generally desirable, should be an issue, providing a non-resident Board member is involved with the building and maintains a reasonably active presence. Good Board members are hard to find and train, if you are in a small building, it can be really tough, so I wouldn't want to lose a good one for those reasons, unless there is a reasonably capable replacement ready to step up. Many Coop governing docs actually do not require any Board officers to actually be shareholders outside the role of President. The hard thing is finding willing shareholders who understand that what is best for the Coop as a community and to maintain a financially viable entity, is not always what is best for a particular individual. In a Coop, a (wo)man's home is not their castle, to do with as they will, it is always subject to the greater good. That is a tough concept.
Carl's first two points are correct as far as I know. Single issue Board members rarely last long,either they achieve their goals and leave, or fail and leave. The greater issue is, even if they recuse themselves, their friendships, presence etc. can affect votes. The real problem is that it is actually a form of self-dealing, if, in fact, they can directly benefit from the outcome of a vote. I don't believe residency, while generally desirable, should be an issue, providing a non-resident Board member is involved with the building and maintains a reasonably active presence. Good Board members are hard to find and train, if you are in a small building, it can be really tough, so I wouldn't want to lose a good one for those reasons, unless there is a reasonably capable replacement ready to step up. Many Coop governing docs actually do not require any Board officers to actually be shareholders outside the role of President. The hard thing is finding willing shareholders who understand that what is best for the Coop as a community and to maintain a financially viable entity, is not always what is best for a particular individual. In a Coop, a (wo)man's home is not their castle, to do with as they will, it is always subject to the greater good. That is a tough concept.
Thanks Carl! Your answers were a big help. I checked our By-Laws and it is not included. Will certainly look to add this policy for sure.
Introduce yourself to other members of Board Talk! Log in below or register here.
Board Talk members who registered prior to March 9th, 2016 will need to reset their password.
Board Talk members who registered prior to March 9th, 2016 will need to reset their password.
Habitat u
visit habitat uHabitat U: learn about how to manage a building, and what you should know as a co-op or condo board member.
Archives
search
Search, by word or phrase, all magazine articles from January 2002 to present. You may print or email your results. Print subscribers receive free access to the Habitat Article Archive.
Ask the Experts
learn moreLearn all the basics of NYC co-op and condo management, with straight talk from heavy hitters in the field of co-op or condo apartments
Professionals in some of the key fields of co-op and condo board governance and building management answer common questions in their areas of expertise
Subscribe
join nowGot elected? Are you on your co-op/condo board?
Then don’t miss a beat! Stories you can use to make your building better, keep it out of trouble, save money, enhance market value, and make your board life a whole lot easier!
Three-part answer:
(1) NO, there is no conflict of interest in this person running for the board. Anyone who qualifies may run for any reason, or no reason ("Hey! I wanna be a director!"). That said, one-issue candidates are rarely good board members.
(2) YES, if this person is elected, he should be prohibited from discussing or voting on sublet fees and policies so long as he is subletting himself. That would be a conflict of interest. (In practice, I can imagine this being problematic if several members of a small board were all subletting.)
(3) MAYBE this person qualifies to run for the board, but maybe not. There's no fixed answer; you'll need to check your By-Laws. In our co-op, a non-resident shareholder would *not* be qualified, due to language we adopted several years ago: "Each Director of the Corporation shall be a shareholder or the spouse of a shareholder. Directors shall be residents of the apartment building owned by the Corporation."
Thank you for rating!
You have already rated this page, you can only rate it once!
Your rating has been changed, thanks for rating!
Board Talk members who registered prior to March 9th, 2016 will need to reset their password.