What does your Proprietary Lease say about elections to fill uncompleted terms? (I very nearly said 'sentences' - lol)

I believe ours states board members can elect officers, and can appoint someone to fill an uncompleted term until the next regular election. Are your terms staggered?

Can't say whether this is kosher or not without having seen your PL, sorry.

> Join the conversation

Have seen this happen with some frequency, sometimes blessed by counsel. Technically, the member resigns the about-to-expire seat & is then appointed to the seat with lots of miles remaining.

Even where all the players are well-intentioned & competent, this ALWAYS sends bad signals to owners, who naturally assume the transfer is improper & that something's being concealed.

In such cases, I recommend Boards: a] announce that they're NOT appointing a replacement--though they could--because the election is imminent; b] endorse the member they want to continue to serve, offering substantive reasons; c] ask for proxies.

Such an approach carries some risk for the Board, but tends to generate ample good will & sufficient proxies.

> Join the conversation

HabitatReporter here with advice from Jeff Reich of Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz, LLP. He says,

"If the situation is as Gloria presented it, it appears that the board has not acted properly. As an initial matter, the condominium’s by-laws should be referred to in order to determine the board’s authority to fill the vacant board seat. Additionally, the by-laws will dictate whether the individual selected to fill the vacancy is entitled to serve out the full term of the manager who resigned or only until the next scheduled unit owner meeting. Assuming that the condominium by-laws do empower the board members to fill the vacancy and provides that the individual selected shall complete the term of the manager who resigned, it would not be proper for the board to select an existing board member. The reason for this is that while one person can hold two distinct offices (such as vice president and secretary), no one person can simultaneously hold two seats on a board. Even if the board member resigned his existing seat just prior to being selected to fill out the term of the manager who stepped down, those board members who are up for re-election would have to answer to the unit owners for this undemocratic act at the upcoming board meeting and could face a hostile electorate and find themselves voted off the board."

> Join the conversation Comments (1)

Thanks for weighing in on this, Jeff...but your response is misleading. You open by saying "it appears the board has not acted properly" but then contradict yourself, acknowledging that a board member could legitimately resign a seat up for election, then be immediately appointed to a seat with a year [or more] remaining.

This is exactly the practice I referred to in my earlier post. You point out that board members employing these tactics risk offending voters & could be voted out of office themselves; I agree fully. However, the board action we envision here is NOT improper, & therefore not actionable...except via the ballot box.

I've seen such maneuvers take place hours before an annual meeting. The election is literally over before most owners grasp what's happening. (Indeed--the election is often over before the meeting begins, determined by proxy.) When the dust clears, few have the money & drive needed to pursue redress...particularly when the best possible outcome is often another undemocratic election.

I'm aware of just one pending solution to such problems: the Ombudsman Bill sponsored by Sen. Krueger & Assemblyman Farrell. If you can suggest any possible alternatives for Gloria, or for others in her situation, I'll certainly help spread the word.

> Join the conversation