I too, live in a very large co op. Perhaps you might consider distributing ballots a few weeks before the meeting allowing owners to vote up until a set time at the meeting. Perhaps a locked box in the lobbies to collect ballots from those who cannot attend the meeting. An option to return the ballot by mail for snow birds or absentee owners. This will give people who cannot attend vote for whomever they choose. They can use a proxy if that is their choice. You can still have nominations from the floor if you choose to by allowing people to change their ballot on the night of the election. Be sure to have a line on the ballot with date and time so that only the last ballot cast is counted. My personal problem with floor nominations is that the voters don't have any time to learn about the candidate and might not vote as they would have with more information. If someone wants to run for the board they should be able to make up their minds at the start of the election process. Sometimes floor nominations are only used as a "spoiler" to prevent an announced candidate from winning. Give this some hard thought. You can then count the ballots THE FOLLOWING DAY, recount if necessry and announce the winners. I hope this is helpful.

> Join the conversation

There should be ballot voting. to allow proxies to be assigned to the board is in any case quite unfair, of course the same board will continue. With ballot voting someone can still run from the floor, the person writing the ballot can always change it at the meeting if they so choose to. But allowing the board to re-elect itself w/proxies seems quite suspicious at best. The question is, does anyone else other than the current board members run for the board? If so, people can fill out proxies with the name they choose, not allow board members assigned to the board.

> Join the conversation

In our large coop we post notices about 5 weeks in advance of the annual meeting to have people who want to run submit their name. We distribute the official meeting notice several weeks before the meeting which includes the proxy ballots with the names and backgrounds of anyone who wants to run for the board. A locked ballot box is at the front desk for shareholders to vote in advance. They can also mail them in. We have a representative from the building attorney coordinate the counting of ballots at the annual meeting. The ballots allow voting for the individual board members or giving the board the proxy to vote on their behalf (which is hardly ever done). We require a majority of the shares to be present at the meeting or voting by proxy to constitute a quorum to hold the meeting and official vote. You can never get this by requiring that many to be at a meeting.

> Join the conversation

I appreciate the responses. A few comments. Typically we have around 80 unit owners represented at the annual, out of nearly 400. So we need a proxy system to gain quorum in the current model since most unit owners don't attend, or live abroad. The folks that do show up tend to be the vocal complainers with an axe to grind.

The proxy allows anyone to write in someone to vote on their behalf, or give the Board the proxy. We argue that if a unit owner give the Board their proxy, they are in fact OK with the status quo. In the last four 4 elections, the Board has achieved over 40% of the common interest with just over 50% of eligible unit owners casting votes. So a sizable majority of votes cast are given to the Board either through attendance at the meeting or proxy. If unit owners were that unhappy, they could always give their proxy to someone else if they choose not to attend in person, so to say that we're always going to be reelected is not true if enough people were vote differently.

But I agree that allowing ballots provides more opportunity to vote for candidates on an individual basis, but we still have the quorum problem which adds complexity to the process. Nearly 20% of the building is non owner occupied.

I'm leery changing a process that works, because of a few outspoken critics who think the system is unfair, because their candidate rarely garners more than 15% of the vote.

In the last three elections, we've only had 2 or 3 other candidates run that were not already Board members. And in each year we've had people run from the floor. They always get about 15% of the vote.

I've been told by the managing agent that this is very typical in NY City and only a few buildings use ballots. So this is interesting feedback.

Thanks

> Join the conversation

I own a Co-op in

> Join the conversation Comments (1)

I sent that last comment a little too early - I own a Co-op and i am told that my lender is suppose to verfiy our insurance coverage trhough the Board of Directors. Is this something lenders do and has anyone seen how they communicate that to the board and how they determine a proper level of coverage?

> Join the conversation Comments (1)

This should be a new topic. You should be able to have the management co. for the coop provide the info directly to your lender, or have them contact the coop's insurance carrier to provide it to your lender. Generally, the coop has it's own underlying mortgage and that lender checks to see that the coop itself has adequate coverage.

> Join the conversation