Hi Naomi,
I would start with reviewing your governing documents – does it allow subletting, and if so does it allow a fee for subletting? If yes to both questions – any fee must be applied equally to all shareholders.
The board has discretion as to what the fee will be and to increase/reduce it. Some buildings don’t allow subletting at all; some have higher fees like $1 a share per month –others a flat fee like $50 or $100. The board can set the fee as necessary under the BCL – and they don’t have to justify the decision to shareholders.

I am glad to hear your building is financially sound - Many boards can point to the increase in water bills this year along with continued rise in real estate tax, energy, insurance prices and staff costs and an increase in regulatory requirements to increase maintenance, fees etc.
Has anything else changed in the sublet policy or is it just the fees? If it’s just the fees, the board may be proactively planning financially to raise capital while still allowing sublets and maintaining costs for all shareholders.

Just my thoughts from a board member that worked hard to impose our first sublet fee where none existed, we needed to increase revenue and while sub letters were slightly disappointed – many are renting several hundred dollars above the maintenance charges - the benefits financially for the corporation have been well received by the board and shareholders.
I hope this helps.

> Join the conversation

Hi Naomi

DavidG is right.
Boards have as much power as the property lease give them, and I can assure you it's not absolute.
But the sublet increase is very likely legal.

I'm glad your building is financially sound, that means the board is doing something right.

Why not transfer the increase to your subtenant ? $45/month seems reasonable.

> Join the conversation

Sublet fees are usually within the scope of the Board's powers. Although they are not often viewed as a positive to the Shareholder who is subletting, excessive subletting in buildings could cause an issue with lending banks, so it's a way of deterring it and giving the Cooperative some soft-income in the process. In addition, subletting is seen as a privilege, not a right, and a lot of Cooperatives like to charge a fee to the shareholder since more likely than not, the Shareholder is making a profit on their apartment per month.

With subletting, the Cooperative should always have a Rider to the sublease agreement stating that if the Shareholder fails to pay maintenance, the Cooperative can capture the arrears directly from the rent of the subtenant and once the Cooperative is made whole again, the Shareholder can receive their rent again.

> Join the conversation

Hello all! HabitatReporter here, this time with advice from Phyllis H. Weisberg, Esq., of Kurzman Karelsen & Frank, LLP:

"Typically, for a sublet fee to be valid, it must be specifically authorized in the proprietary lease. If not, except in limited cases, it will be invalid.
If the sublet fee here is authorized by the proprietary lease, then the question is whether the proprietary lease also gives the Board the discretion to set and/or change the amount. If the proprietary lease in this case specifically set the sublet fee at $55.00 and did not give the Board discretion to change the amount, then, notwithstanding the Board’s broad powers, it is without power to change the amount without amending the proprietary lease – an act that requires approval of a supermajority of shareholders. If, however, the proprietary lease gives the Board the authority to set and/or change the amount, then the Board acted lawfully in changing the amount and its determination will withstand legal challenge."

> Join the conversation