Katharine A. Muscalino in Board Operations on July 19, 2013
Grandview at Riverwalk Port Imperial Condominium Association in West New York, N.J., is one such association, but its frustrations were recently assuaged on appeal in Grandview at Riverwalk Port Imperial Condominium Association, Inc. v. Han. While this case is specific to New Jersey and its statutes, the larger lesson is that it is worth exploring the possibility that a court erred in not granting attorneys' fees to your condo association.
In this case, the association sued a unit owner for failure to pay common charges (called "maintenance fees" or "common assessments" in New Jersey, to be very precise), only to have the Special Civil Court inexplicably deny its demand for attorneys' fees.
As the court wrote:
The Association appealed the judge's rejection of its demand, and the Appellate Division reversed the Special Civil Court, finding that the fees were authorized by statute and by the Association's governing documents. Noting that the unit owner had not objected to the reasonableness of the attorneys' fees and that the Appellate Division itself perceived "nothing unreasonable" in the attorneys' fees, the Appellate Division remanded the matter to have the judgment amended to include the attorneys fees.
Attorney Katharine A. Muscalino is an associate with Porzio Bromberg & Newman and a frequent speaker and panelist on real-estate topics. This is adapted from her blog post at her firm's website.
For more, see our Site Map or join our Archive >>