Rare Win for Affordable Housing Over Gentrification

Clinton Hill

Still affordable: the St. James Towers co-op in Clinton Hill, Brooklyn (image via Google Maps)

March 1, 2017 — St. James Towers co-op in Brooklyn votes to stick with Mitchell-Lama.

In a vote watched closely by opponents of the gentrification now sweeping Brooklyn, shareholders at the 326-unit St. James Towers co-op in Clinton Hill have voted to remain in the affordable Mitchell-Lama program instead of going to market-rate sales.

The vote was a victory for Mayor Bill de Blasio, who has vowed to add and protect thousands of affordable housing units in a city that is becoming less affordable by the day. The vote was also a blow against the wave of gentrification that is particularly visible in Brooklyn, Manhattan and parts of Queens.

“As gentrification continues to displace long-term area residents, the Mitchell-Lama program is among the few counteractive measures that currently exists to preserve affordable housing for middle-income families,” city council member Laurie Cumbo, a Brooklyn Democrat, said on the eve of the St. James Towers vote, as reported by the BKLYNER website. “Privatization undermines our city’s commitment to New Yorkers of all background – affordability for all.”

There are compelling arguments on both sides of the issue. Opponents of privatization, like Cumbo, view it as a threat to a vital, and beleaguered, piece of the city’s housing stock. Proponents of privatization counter that after serving the required time in the Mitchell-Lama program, with its tax breaks and limited resale prices, shareholders are entitled to reap the rewards of the city’s currently hyper-inflated real estate prices.

Last week’s vote at St. James Towers was the second in the three-step process of privatization, each of which requires approval by a two-thirds super-majority of shareholders. In the first vote, held in 2014, a sufficient number of shareholders voted to authorize a privatization feasibility study. Last week’s vote was on whether or not to authorize the money to prepare an offering plan. A third vote, which will not be held, would have determined whether the co-op stayed in the Mitchell-Lama program or went to market-rate sales.

Subscribe

join now

Got elected? Are you on your co-op/condo board?

Then don’t miss a beat! Stories you can use to make your building better, keep it out of trouble, save money, enhance market value, and make your board life a whole lot easier!