Subscribe for Daily Updates!
Our building likes to offset the abatement with an assessment. However there is a bylaw that they cannot impose any assessments without a vote of all shareholders. They have put this assessment on our bill without the required vote claiming it is a "tax" assessment and not a regular capitol assessment. This means over $1000 for me - If I do not pay the assessment until it is voted on, can they charge me a late fee? legally? I will pay the rest of the maintainence minus the assessment.
that if the holder of unsold shares holds any shares then there must be a vote (he has plenty) . it also says if the reserve fund is under $15,000. OUrs is way over that. while they sort this out, they are apparently calling the reserve fund a slucsh fund.( I do believe shareholders would vote it in if it were an emergency. ) - but it it is a bylaw it must be upheld, no?
Hi, QT,
I've lived in two co-ops and in both the abatement was offset by an equal charge. If your by-laws restrict assessing so dramatically then, as AdC points out, your board is severely limited in its ability to raise funds
But the board can always work around the limitation. Instead of calling it an "assessment," they could call it a "surcharge" or "fee" and avoid the issue. Why don't you make that suggestion?
hi treasurer,
is it legal to just plunk on a fee like that? without it being in house rules etc? we also have had a 19% mntnce in crease in the last three years so shareholders are restless.
I'm not a lawyer, so don't take this as legal advice!
But just you would charge a shareholder for other work -- such as an emergency leak, where the super calls a plumber & the plumber bills the co-op -- you can certainly charge for this.
I'd urge you to call your lawyer first if you want his/her opinion.
oops! i was replying to a different thread -- sorry ... anyway:
Check your bylaws. What do they say about a surcharge? Or one-time fee? I'm no lawyer, but I don't see why a corporation should be prevented from raising money under N.Y. State corporation law. Sure, it's using a loophole to your advantage, but if it's the board's decision that you need the money to stay in the black, you have the authority raise the funds.
As mentioned in my mistaken response, check with your lawyer (or property manager) for more info.
Introduce yourself to other members of Board Talk! Log in below or register here.
Board Talk members who registered prior to March 9th, 2016 will need to reset their password.
Please make sure that the vote of shareholders is necessary in your by-laws as a result of the first few years of operations or the sponsor involved holding a certain percentage of the unsold shares of the corporation. Otherwise, the by-laws have tied the hands of the board more than necessary by not being able to assess when necessary, i.e., capital emergency repairs, raising reserves, etc.
Now, returning to your question, if the board proves you wrong because you believe that you need to vote, then you get the late fees.
AdC
Thank you for rating!
You have already rated this page, you can only rate it once!
Your rating has been changed, thanks for rating!
Board Talk members who registered prior to March 9th, 2016 will need to reset their password.