Dec. 14, 2009 — Robert Frost was being ironic when he wrote, "Good fences make good neighbors." So he might have gotten a rueful chuckle at the thought of adjacent co-op and condo buildings sharing fences, retaining walls or common walls — known as "party walls" — and seeing how relations between neighbors can go from cordial to catastrophic.
When the latter happens, what can you do? What steps can you take? It all comes down to communicating well — as one Manhattan board learned through hard experience.
Like many older New York buildings, the five-story, 12-unit co-op at 126 East 16th Street near Union Square (click on image to enlarge) shares a wall with the property next door. There are also adjoining gardens behind both buildings. Until four years ago, the basement and the first floor of that neighboring structure housed a preschool called Beginnings, which rented its space from the building's owner. When the property went up for sale, Joe Gosler, the owner of Beginnings, decided to buy it and expand the school into the upper floors.
That was when things began to get complicated.
Before the school could expand, building codes required that the building have another path of egress to the street. Remarkably, one suggestion was to have preschoolers and staff walk into the rear garden and then actually pass through one of the two occupied, residential garden apartments next door — right through someone's home — and from there gain access to the co-op's front lobby, front door and, finally, the street.
"It was clearly not an ideal arrangement for them or us," says Gosler. "The attractive thing for us was that it was a less expensive option."
The co-op board, understandably, did not warm to the idea. Then it made what was, in retrospect, a strategic mistake. A member of the board had two children enrolled at Beginnings. Rather than dealing with the preschool as a group, the board let that parent try to work out a compromise.
An in-person meeting, instead of
using one board member as an
intermediary, might have worked out better.
"We thought a friendly face might make things go more smoothly," says Amy Benjamin, an intellectual-property lawyer who is president of the five-member board. "But it didn't work out that way. Maybe we should have sat down over coffee with them."
When it became clear that he was not going to be granted access to one of the co-op's two garden apartments, Gosler consulted an engineer for other options. The engineer reported that building codes would be satisfied by a fire escape on the front of the building that reached the second story.
And so the fire escape was attached to the building's façade — including the "party wall." The residents of the co-op were dismayed by the aesthetics of the fire escape, the only one on a block dominated by century-old townhouses. Worse, the construction caused some cracking of the co-op's facade.
"We were not happy," says Benjamin. "We had an engineer come to look at the cracks to see how serious they were. They were horizontal and didn't require immediate repair. The engineer did some research and learned [the neighbors] were entitled to go into their half of the party wall, which is what they did. There was some back and forth, but we realized we didn't have a leg to stand on."
No Lone Wolves
One thing all parties agree on is that there was a fundamental failure to communicate. "I think communication is the key," Benjamin says. "You can't force the other side to communicate with you, but if the board had an in-person meeting instead of using one board member as an intermediary, it might have worked out better."
Gosler agrees. "Each building situation is different and there's no single blueprint on how to do this," he says. "But more direct communication is always preferable. It has always been my business management style to deal directly with people, rather than talking to a third party or a person in a less authoritative role."
Live and learn. When the co-op board was faced with a second issue over shared property, it worked out a far more satisfactory solution. This time the source of the problem was smoke emanating from the chimneys on the co-op's roof.
"Some of the chimneys are not tall enough and smoke was blowing back into the top-floor apartments," says Benjamin, noting that every apartment has a fireplace, and the four top-floor apartments have private roof decks. "It became an acute problem when people started using their decks more. Between that and new people coming into the building and using their fireplaces more, it came to the board's attention about two years ago."
This time, the solution lay with the neighbor to the west, a 10-story commercial building at the corner of Irving Place and East 16th Street. Two contractors suggested installing 12-foot chimneys and attaching them to the wall of the neighboring building for support.
Next >> Smoke-stacking the deck