As I’ve said a couple times now, I would never try to head down the Pullman path. Quixotic, too expensive, too divisive.
. . . it seems like the board could be in a lot of trouble if this aggressive shareholder ends up hurting someone and the board was aware of the issue but tried to hide it.
Agree; this is a real concern and this is why I recommended that the board at least make a notation that a building resident had alerted a board member to a potential (alleged?) problem. Just a little note, with a date, nothing more, in case another event occurs in the future.