ENGINEER CO-OP CONDO ENERGY POLICY OP-ED P2

Several legislators have spoken to me privately about their belief in the need for electrical submetering but admit that mandating "pay for what you use" submeters would never happen because politicians tend to avoid areas of potential controversy that may alienate some voters.

The New York State Energy Conservation Construction Code currently prohibits new construction of master-metered residential buildings, unless the apartments are submetered. Currently existing master-metered buildings can convert to direct metering by their local utility, though such buildings would lose the favorable bulk rate.

Additionally, conversions to direct metering are generally far more costly than the submetering option and also preclude the buildings from installing effective cogeneration equipment and from participating in state and utility incentive programs that are dedicated to master-metered buildings.

Unfortunately, many energy professionals in New York State, whether employed by a state agency or in the private sector, are reluctant to weigh in on this subject because of their direct or indirect dependency on NYSERDA for contracts or employment.

A Proposal 

What is the solution? If New York State wants to adopt a meaningful energy policy, one of the first things it should do is to make each individual who consumes energy pay for his or her own use. Nothing makes one more accountable than having to pay money. Whether it takes the leadership of the governor's office or the actions of the New York State assembly and senate, it is apparent that legislation must be passed to mandate that all master-metered buildings implement "pay for what you use" submetering.

This action would also relieve the concerns of the PSC of becoming involved in controversy. It would initially require the education of our politicians to understand the energy saving benefits of "pay for what you use" submetering and allow them to see the complaints within a broader perspective. They could then make more meaningful decisions based on the overall energy picture. Implementation of this energy plan can be accomplished over the long term, allowing ample time for the master-metered buildings to conform. NYSERDA incentives should be made available to defray some of the buildings' installation costs.

I would propose that the incentive schedule be scaled so that the maximum incentives available are during year No. 1, with lesser amounts available until year No. 5, after which no incentives would be available. This would offer enough time for buildings to adopt "pay for what you use" submetering and, at the same time, provide an incentive to act quickly.

I have decided, after more than 40 years of practicing engineering in New York State, to speak out on this subject because, frankly, I am tired of fighting a flawed system and would appreciate some help from those who have the power to correct this mess. It is time to take responsibility.

For articles going back to 2002, join our Archive >>