I am wondering what would sustain or increase the values of a cooperative better.
If the by-laws allowed:
a) After owning for 1 year you can sublease for 5 years out of a 6 year period.
b) After owning for 1year you can sublease indefinitely.
The variables that I feel come in to play are as follows:
a) Currently there are more apartments then usual on the market, this can help decrease the supply, helping to sustain perhaps increase values.
b) There is a flip tax that is received on the sale of an apartment. However if the shareholder starts to sublease instead the potential revenue will not be the same.
c) Subtenants may not care for the property and community the same as an owner will.
Thank you for your thoughts.
Introduce yourself to other members of Board Talk! Log in below or register here.
Board Talk members who registered prior to March 9th, 2016 will need to reset their password.
I think if you allow subleasing indefinitely the bldg will attract a whole different kind of buyer; investment buyers. Your bldg will turn into a rental type bldg but you will be able to sell more apts. So it depends on the goal of the coop. Do you want predominantly owners or a more transient constituency.
Thank you for rating!
You have already rated this page, you can only rate it once!
Your rating has been changed, thanks for rating!
Board Talk members who registered prior to March 9th, 2016 will need to reset their password.