are these announcements common?
"NYISO has issued a notice that they WILL be having a one hour mandatory event call (reduction of electricity) per ECS' Demand Response Program for TODAY follows...
DAY: TUESDAY DATE: JULY 28 TIME: 2:00 PM - 3:00 PM (1 Hour)"
Our coop has been using the closing date to establish the parking list order. There are shareholders that want to change from an indoor to an outdoor and vice-versa. How have others handled such a situation and how does one keep a list where we have to painstakingly have to cross reference who wants what?
PS a board member upon hearing that an indoor space became available, wants the space. Advise!
Sometimes the two year tax forms submitted by an applicant just don’t smell right. Yes, the forms are signed. But, in this day and age, with a tax preparation software package, one can easily manufacture a “nice” tax package in a matter of minutes.
Sure, the 1040 can be signed!
Who’s the wiser?
Just ask each applicant (yes, each to avoid a discrimination suit) to submit a completed IRS Form 8821, Tax Information Authorization naming the co-op corporation as legal “Appointee”
Visit:
http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f8821.pdf
Neat, huh?
We use this form for every package and surprise, surprise no more smelly applications.
A friend (a coop board VP) called last night with an odd question, and I didn't know what to tell her. It's a bit of a long story.
Her married super is having an affair with a married SH ("Mary"). A few months ago, Mary told my friend in confidence it's been going on over a year, they're very happy, etc. My friend told her fellow board members who all just wanted to stay out of it.
A SH e-mailed the prop mgr that she saw Mary and the super exit a restaurant last weekend holding hands, kissing, etc., said this is very inappropriate, and wants to know what the coop is going to do about it.
The surprised prop mgr asked the super who denied it. My friend's board hasn't told the prop mgr they knew of this. He told the SH the coop knows nothing and the super denies it but the SH has told everyone what she saw last weekend. A few SHs even asked Mary who denied it but it's caused a building uproar (125 units). Yesterday, Mary asked my friend if she revealed what she said in confidence and my friend swore she told no one.
Mary's husband and the super's wife are very upset over this, and Mary and the super both deny to their spouses that it's true.
The prop mgr still doesn't know my friend and her board knew about this, so they're in a very awkward position now.
My friend asked me what to do but I wouldn't advise her. I think she and her board should just let rumblings die down. Btw, she said the restaurant where the SH saw Mary and the super is nowhere near their coop. As long as the super is doing his job and not causing bldg problems, this is his (and Mary's) personal business.
Anyone have any comments/suggestions? I've been on my board a long time but I've never run up against a situation like this.
It should be know that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, who buys the bulk of both conforming loans, those under $417,000.00 and 'agency jumbo loans' those up to $729,750.00 have changed dramatically and some cooperatives, in paticular, no longer meet the requirements, as shareholders and for underlying mortgage refinance. For example there is now a minimun reserve requirement for small building, those under 10 uniye. In addition the require for BusinessIncome\Rental Value must be not less that the annual maintenance. That, most cooperatves do not meet so, the builings are being declined.
There is more
It may be worth your asking your atttoney, banker\broker.
Richard Russell
Pres\CEO
www.richlandequity.com
212-681-9888
Does anyone in the Village/Chelsea/Murry Hill area have a good management company recommendation for a small condo? We've reached out to some companies and their minimum fee is $30K/year.
We're looking for a great company willing to service our smaller condo (20 units) for a reasonable price that is doing an excellent job for other buildings in the area. All help appreciated.
The new board of directors of my coop recently voted to rescind the monthly fee for use of our bike room. Every one of the current board members stores a bicycle in the bike room. Since each of them has a personal financial interest in the matter, are they barred from voting on it?
Anyone... Last year we passed new house rules that will limit the number of anamils to three... but we have an elderly, rent-controled tenet who has about eight-nine cats. There have never been any complaints nor is there an odor... Yet,the owner of her apartment has been served with eviction notice unless she gets rid of her cats.
There is a law stating that if there are no compaints for three months from the owner/landlord -- the cats are automatically legal. This complaint/eviction is new, the rules were passed last year -- so this would apply to her. But we were told that there is another law protecting rent-controlled tenets from this kind of harassment.
Anyone know of this law?
With the renovation of our garage roof (courtyard shareholder space), our Board is considering professionally installing a permanent gas grill (gas line – no tanks). Would anyone know the legalities of this or have any experience with how to allow shareholders to use this?
Thanks!
We have never locked in our fuel, and have been informed by our managing agent that the they don’t participate in fuel lockins...
That said, the boards independent review has shown us that a lock in good be a good management tool and hedge against a rise in prices, while the downside is there, we feel it’s limited considering what we paid the last two years.
We are now considering a lock in for 5mos to lock in this years heating budget which is lower then the last two years by 50%+. What are your thoughts and or feelings and experiences?
Some other interesting notes – we are a small co-op 58 apts that uses about 48K gallons a year with about 20K required for 09 at this point. Residential board members are inclined to move forward, sponsor has indicated they have no interest and would vote against a lock in.
Thank You all for your responses in advance.
Introduce yourself to other members of Board Talk! Log in below or register here.
Board Talk members who registered prior to March 9th, 2016 will need to reset their password.
Simple, board members are first and foremost shareholders, thus no special treatment e.g.: one can’t go to the head of the line. Butt out!!
Keep each of the lists in date of application sequence. Yes one for each parking area, e.g.; indoor upper, indoor lower, outdoor front, outdoor back, etc.
If a space becomes available in the indoor upper area, offer it to the shareholder on the top of list. If the shareholder declines, offer the space to the next shareholder, and so forth. The shareholder that declines goes to the end of the list declined with a new date, the date of offer and decline whichever is later.
Same goes for all the other spaces.
In this case a shareholder can be on all four lists. Having accepted any slot in one area, the resident remains on the other lists, untouched.
If one accepts an indoor upper space one can be still listed on the other lists. If the shareholder’s name is the next selected on any otherlist, the shareholder can either accept or decline (e.g.: go to the bottom of the list).
Even if the shareholder accepts a spot, e.g.: upper indoor, the shareholder can still go on the same list (bottom of course) in hopes of a better location at a future time.
Date of purchase has no meaning; only the date of application for one or more lists.
And, most importantly, a board member may never see the list, nor can the building manager reveal the contents of the list. Yes, the building manager must be trustworthy.
Thank you for rating!
You have already rated this page, you can only rate it once!
Your rating has been changed, thanks for rating!
Board Talk members who registered prior to March 9th, 2016 will need to reset their password.